<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Review Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unsympathetic.net/2006/11/10/review-review-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unsympathetic.net/2006/11/10/review-review-me/</link>
	<description>Easily distracted by shiny things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 20:43:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veronique</title>
		<link>http://unsympathetic.net/2006/11/10/review-review-me/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsympathetic.net/?p=198#comment-533</guid>
		<description>This sounds interesting. I am looking forward to your feedback on this issue. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds interesting. I am looking forward to your feedback on this issue. <img src='http://unsympathetic.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://unsympathetic.net/2006/11/10/review-review-me/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsympathetic.net/?p=198#comment-532</guid>
		<description>And, from the recently added &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reviewme.com/faq.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FAQ page&lt;/a&gt; for ReviewMe:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Can I require a positive review?&lt;/strong&gt;

We do not allow advertisers to require a positive review. The vast majority of reviews are measuredly positive, although many do contain constructive criticism. We view this as a bonus: how else can you quickly and cheaply get feedback on a product or service from influencers?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It appears that I can be as negative as I want, although, I doubt that would get me more offers to review things. And I so want to review things!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, from the recently added <a href="http://www.reviewme.com/faq.php" rel="nofollow">FAQ page</a> for ReviewMe:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Can I require a positive review?</strong></p>
<p>We do not allow advertisers to require a positive review. The vast majority of reviews are measuredly positive, although many do contain constructive criticism. We view this as a bonus: how else can you quickly and cheaply get feedback on a product or service from influencers?
</p></blockquote>
<p>It appears that I can be as negative as I want, although, I doubt that would get me more offers to review things. And I so want to review things!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://unsympathetic.net/2006/11/10/review-review-me/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsympathetic.net/?p=198#comment-530</guid>
		<description>I have no idea. I like the idea of knowing that they&#039;ve been paid for the review, but you&#039;re right. If the review is bought, how much is it really worth?

The Review Me blog has a &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; title=&quot;ReviewMe: Should bloggers disclose sponsored posts?&quot; href=&quot;http://www.reviewme.com/blog/2006/10/05/should-bloggers-disclose-sponsored-posts/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post up about this&lt;/a&gt;, as Michael Arrington of &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; title=&quot;Tech Crunch&quot; href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tech Crunch&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a title=&quot;TechCrunch: PayPerPost offers to buy your soul.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/30/payperpostcom-offers-to-buy-your-soul/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;attacked another pay-per-post venture&lt;/a&gt;, as at first glance, it appeared that they didn&#039;t have to disclose they were blogging for money.

I think that most bloggers who do the &quot;review me&quot; thing won&#039;t be as obvious as I am about the fact that they are being paid. I&#039;ve got this policy as being as up front as possible (as me a question, and I&#039;ll always anwer it), but I&#039;m sure others will be shady, with it being small text, pushed to the bottom of the post.

I suppose we&#039;ll see over time if this takes off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea. I like the idea of knowing that they&#8217;ve been paid for the review, but you&#8217;re right. If the review is bought, how much is it really worth?</p>
<p>The Review Me blog has a <a rel="nofollow" title="ReviewMe: Should bloggers disclose sponsored posts?" href="http://www.reviewme.com/blog/2006/10/05/should-bloggers-disclose-sponsored-posts/" rel="nofollow">post up about this</a>, as Michael Arrington of <a rel="nofollow" title="Tech Crunch" href="http://www.techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">Tech Crunch</a> <a title="TechCrunch: PayPerPost offers to buy your soul." href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/30/payperpostcom-offers-to-buy-your-soul/" rel="nofollow">attacked another pay-per-post venture</a>, as at first glance, it appeared that they didn&#8217;t have to disclose they were blogging for money.</p>
<p>I think that most bloggers who do the &#8220;review me&#8221; thing won&#8217;t be as obvious as I am about the fact that they are being paid. I&#8217;ve got this policy as being as up front as possible (as me a question, and I&#8217;ll always anwer it), but I&#8217;m sure others will be shady, with it being small text, pushed to the bottom of the post.</p>
<p>I suppose we&#8217;ll see over time if this takes off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan T. Cox</title>
		<link>http://unsympathetic.net/2006/11/10/review-review-me/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan T. Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsympathetic.net/?p=198#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  I wonder how long they can possibly stay in business.  Are people really going to want to trust reviews that were /clearly/ marked as paid for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  I wonder how long they can possibly stay in business.  Are people really going to want to trust reviews that were /clearly/ marked as paid for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

